.png)
How We Verify Scam Reports
At ScamWatching.org, our goal is to help readers understand online risks by examining reported scams with clarity, accuracy, and evidence-based research. Every investigation follows a structured process designed to evaluate digital footprints, verify claims, and present information responsibly. This page outlines the methods we use to review reports and identify common red flags.
Understanding the Initial Report
Every investigation begins with an assessment of the information provided to us, whether it comes from user submissions, public tips, or ongoing monitoring. This includes examining screenshots, messages, website links, transaction details, wallet addresses, or any other materials related to the claim.
At this stage, the goal is simply to understand what is being reported, what questions need to be answered, and which parts of the situation require verification.
Evaluating Digital Presence
One of the most important steps in our process is reviewing the digital footprint of the business, platform, or individual involved. This often includes checking when a website was created, how it is hosted, who controls the domain, and whether the structure of the site matches standard practices for legitimate organizations.
For cryptocurrency-related claims, we also review publicly available blockchain records to understand how wallets, contracts, or transactions behave. We compare this behavior with typical patterns seen in safe or unsafe platforms.
Confirming Identity and Business Claims
Scam reports frequently involve companies or services that present themselves as licensed, accredited, or professionally recognized. We investigate these claims by comparing them with official public registries, regulatory databases, corporate filings, or state records.
When a business lists physical locations, phone numbers, or professional credentials, those details are compared against publicly accessible sources to determine whether they can be verified.
Assessing Evidence Provided
Materials sent by users—such as emails, chats, documents, or images—are reviewed to determine if they appear consistent with legitimate communication. We look at formatting, metadata, timestamps, wording, and visual accuracy.
For financial and crypto submissions, we confirm whether provided wallet addresses or transaction IDs match real activity.
This step helps determine whether the evidence supports or contradicts the claims being made.
Comparing Findings With Known Patterns
Many scams, regardless of industry, share recognizable behaviors.
We compare the findings of each case with known patterns such as high-pressure messaging, unrealistic promises, anonymous ownership, falsified documentation, or inconsistent website details.
By identifying similarities between different reports, we can place each case within a broader context and explain the risk level clearly.
Developing a Clear, Educational Summary
Once the available information has been reviewed, we create a summary that presents what can be verified, what remains uncertain, and what elements suggest caution.
Our write-ups are designed to help readers understand the situation without exaggeration or speculation.
The purpose is educational: to give the public the tools to recognize potential threats before they engage with unfamiliar platforms or services.
Maintaining Independence and Safety
ScamWatching.org does not offer refund recovery, investment advice, medical guidance, or legal services. We never charge users, request personal documents, or contact businesses on anyone’s behalf.
Our work is focused entirely on research, documentation, and public awareness.
Keeping a clear boundary between investigation and direct intervention helps protect users from secondary scams that often target victims seeking help.
Handling User Submissions
All reports submitted through our contact channels are reviewed manually. Identifying information such as phone numbers, email addresses, or personal financial details is removed before publication.
Only the features relevant to understanding the case are included in our educational reports.
Our Commitment to Transparency
ScamWatching.org exists to make online environments safer by explaining digital risks clearly and responsibly.
Our verification process is continually refined as new technologies, scams, and industries emerge.
By making our methods public, we help readers understand not only what we report, but how those conclusions are reached.